Will there be an anti-Trump protest march with at least 1m reported total participants in the US before 1st June 2025?
➕
Plus
263
Ṁ120k
Jun 1
97%
chance

Has to happen in a single day. Similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women's_March which reported between 3,267,134 and 5,246,670 total participants in the US. I'll resolve based on a consensus of credible media sources and/or wikipedia.

  • Update 2025-02-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Anti-Trump Protest Definition Clarification

    • A protest does not need to be solely a demonstration against the person of Donald Trump. It is sufficient if it is motivated by his policy positions, rhetoric, or their perceived impact.

    • For example, the Women's March qualifies as an anti-Trump protest because it was prompted by Trump’s policy positions and rhetoric.

  • Update 2025-04-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Eligible Protest Clarification:

    • Any type of protest qualifies: The event does not need to be a march; any protest is sufficient as long as it is motivated by Trump’s policy positions, rhetoric, or their perceived impact.

    • Example Provided: The Women’s March is given solely as an example of a protest that would qualify

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

@mods Please resolve YES.

It looks like the account that created this market has been deleted.

The crowd counting consortium data for April is out: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/RI9JFU

Their estimates for all "Hands off" events on April 5th are:

low: 849 K, mean: 1 121 K, high: 1 394 K

Flipping through the data, I would say those are potentially a bit conservative as reporting like "over X" or "more than X" is counted the same as "precisely X" (i.e. the same number in low, mean, high columns)

@AIBear R code for reproduction/checks:

library(readr)

library(dplyr)

dat <- read_csv("~/ccc-phase3-public.csv", guess_max = 5000)

dat |> filter(date == "4/5/2025",grepl("^Hands off", title, ignore.case = TRUE)) |>

summarise(sum(size_low, na.rm = TRUE), sum(size_mean, na.rm = TRUE), sum(size_high, na.rm = TRUE))

bought Ṁ250 YES

@AIBear looks good to me!

@dlin007 you're the market creator, are you good to resolve this based on the mean being well above 1M?

@JamesBaker3 yes. the best good-faith estimates (CCC, Wikipedia, DemocracyNow) are at or above 1 million so i'll be resolving YES unless someone produces an equally rigorous estimate supporting < 1 M

bought Ṁ25 NO

If NYC and Washington had 100k and had highest turnout, do we think another 10 cities had 50k? 100 cities had 5k? Still seems close to me but too lazy to try running numbers.

How will this resolve if Wikipedia estimates a range e.g. 800k - 1.1m?

@JamesBaker3 Where can I see all their updates? I can only see up to October

@manifoldgod @JamesBaker3

I emailed the consortium

Hi Siebe,

The Crowd Counting Consortium team shared they’re currently working on it, but it takes time and they don’t have an expected date for the data release as of yet. Thanks for checking!

Best,
Danielle

Perfect seismograph market.

bought Ṁ100 YES

It's unclear to me whether the turnout has to be in a single location.

@Kynakwado Not if the Women's march qualifies, which it unequivocally does.

@JamesBaker3 Yeah the Women's March was neither all in one spot, nor 100% marching, so it's pretty clear that those concerns from the comments won't be an issue.

bought Ṁ4,000 YES

@DavidFWatson ChatGPT is not a reliable source. Did you read any of the articles it linked?

@jumpman_folder I looked at the cited Wikipedia article, The number of cited cities, and looked at crowd size pictures for a few. Shall we try to add them all up, I agree that’s a reasonable follow up.

@Siebe those are about 1% of their metro populations. I see 144 cities on the Wikipedia list. That might cover 250 million people, leading us to 2.5 million protesters. This doesn’t account for variations in partisanship though. (I haven’t had time to further check individual protests obviously)

@DavidFWatson I appreciate the attempt at an estimate, but this doesn't take into account selection bias - these are probably the biggest protests proportional their population. For example, this implies a 200K protest in New York, which definitely didn't happen

@Siebe fair enough, the nyc one looks a fair bit smaller

@jumpman_folder thanks, that would imply a much lower density, or the map tool being wrong. I did mark the area right..

Comment hidden
boughtṀ4,000YES
reposted
Comment hidden
© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules