
Has to happen in a single day. Similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women's_March which reported between 3,267,134 and 5,246,670 total participants in the US. I'll resolve based on a consensus of credible media sources and/or wikipedia.
Update 2025-02-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Anti-Trump Protest Definition Clarification
A protest does not need to be solely a demonstration against the person of Donald Trump. It is sufficient if it is motivated by his policy positions, rhetoric, or their perceived impact.
For example, the Women's March qualifies as an anti-Trump protest because it was prompted by Trump’s policy positions and rhetoric.
Update 2025-04-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Eligible Protest Clarification:
Any type of protest qualifies: The event does not need to be a march; any protest is sufficient as long as it is motivated by Trump’s policy positions, rhetoric, or their perceived impact.
Example Provided: The Women’s March is given solely as an example of a protest that would qualify
The crowd counting consortium data for April is out: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/RI9JFU
Their estimates for all "Hands off" events on April 5th are:
low: 849 K, mean: 1 121 K, high: 1 394 K
Flipping through the data, I would say those are potentially a bit conservative as reporting like "over X" or "more than X" is counted the same as "precisely X" (i.e. the same number in low, mean, high columns)
@AIBear R code for reproduction/checks:
library(readr)
library(dplyr)
dat <- read_csv("~/ccc-phase3-public.csv", guess_max = 5000)
dat |> filter(date == "4/5/2025",grepl("^Hands off", title, ignore.case = TRUE)) |>
summarise(sum(size_low, na.rm = TRUE), sum(size_mean, na.rm = TRUE), sum(size_high, na.rm = TRUE))
@JamesBaker3 yes. the best good-faith estimates (CCC, Wikipedia, DemocracyNow) are at or above 1 million so i'll be resolving YES unless someone produces an equally rigorous estimate supporting < 1 M
Looks like https://ash.harvard.edu/programs/crowd-counting-consortium/ would be a good resolution source. They update monthly.
I emailed the consortium
Hi Siebe,
The Crowd Counting Consortium team shared they’re currently working on it, but it takes time and they don’t have an expected date for the data release as of yet. Thanks for checking!
Best,
Danielle
https://www.democracynow.org/2025/4/7/hands_off_protest says "over one million" and estimates 100,000 in NYC
@JamesBaker3 Yeah the Women's March was neither all in one spot, nor 100% marching, so it's pretty clear that those concerns from the comments won't be an issue.
I think this is already yes: https://chatgpt.com/share/67f486d0-1438-800c-85bc-c8b55ea6993a
@jumpman_folder I looked at the cited Wikipedia article, The number of cited cities, and looked at crowd size pictures for a few. Shall we try to add them all up, I agree that’s a reasonable follow up.
@DavidFWatson I made 2 estimates where there were relatively clear aerial pictures
https://bsky.app/profile/siebepersists.bsky.social/post/3lm66tnvesc25
@Siebe those are about 1% of their metro populations. I see 144 cities on the Wikipedia list. That might cover 250 million people, leading us to 2.5 million protesters. This doesn’t account for variations in partisanship though. (I haven’t had time to further check individual protests obviously)
@DavidFWatson I appreciate the attempt at an estimate, but this doesn't take into account selection bias - these are probably the biggest protests proportional their population. For example, this implies a 200K protest in New York, which definitely didn't happen
@Siebe FWIW this article is estimating 25k for St. Paul: https://kstp.com/kstp-news/top-news/thousands-of-people-gather-at-state-capitol-for-hands-off-rally/
@jumpman_folder thanks, that would imply a much lower density, or the map tool being wrong. I did mark the area right..