Is solving fusion harder than finding a room temperature superconductor?
Is solving fusion harder than finding a room temperature superconductor?
➕
Plus
31
Ṁ814
2100
25%
chance

I find it interesting that both are basically computational problems - simulating plasma physics or material science.

This market resolves true if a room temperature superconductor is officially found (and recognized by the scientific community) before a company manages to achieve net fusion energy production.

If the opposite happens, the outcome is false.

N/A if neither happens in this century.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00


Sort by:
bought Ṁ80 NO1y

ITER should, if everything goes well, resolve this, right? It aims to achieve engineering breakeven. Unless this question is about commercial breakeven.

@SimoneRomeo

bought Ṁ50 NO1y

@SimoneRomeo Ok well I'm pretty sure we'll get there in the next 10 years.

Basically computational problems

No? Fusion is absolutely an engineering problem. It's about containing super-hot plasma in insanely strong magnetic fields.

Room-temperature superconductors is mostly a theory problem. Our theory of superconductors is highly incomplete. If we had better theories, we could use computer simulations to search for materials, or just experiment with the right ones. But right now we have no idea what to even look for. Hell, we don't even know if room-temperature superconductors can even exist.

1y

@Shump The challenge of achieving engineering break-even in a fusion reactor is not solely a computational problem, but it certainly involves significant computational aspects. First of all, computational physics plays a crucial role in understanding the complex processes within a fusion reactor, such as plasma behavior, energy confinement, and stability.

bought Ṁ10 YES1y

@SimoneRomeo basically all cutting-edge physical science research "involves significant computational aspects" in the year 2024

1y

"I find it interesting that both are basically computational problems" only insofar as both fields are so far from maturity that modeling and simulation are the only low-hanging fruit

sold Ṁ10 NO1y

Reaction breakeven or engineering breakeven?

1y

@Noah1 engineering break even. The one that didn't happen yet 😂😂

1y

@SimoneRomeo NIF is a government lab so I don't think it would have resolved this.

What is this?

What is Manifold?
Manifold is the world's largest social prediction market.
Get accurate real-time odds on politics, tech, sports, and more.
Win cash prizes for your predictions on our sweepstakes markets! Always free to play. No purchase necessary.
Are our predictions accurate?
Yes! Manifold is very well calibrated, with forecasts on average within 4 percentage points of the true probability. Our probabilities are created by users buying and selling shares of a market.
In the 2022 US midterm elections, we outperformed all other prediction market platforms and were in line with FiveThirtyEight’s performance. Many people who don't like trading still use Manifold to get reliable news.
How do I win cash prizes?
Manifold offers two market types: play money and sweepstakes.
All questions include a play money market which uses mana Ṁ and can't be cashed out.
Selected markets will have a sweepstakes toggle. These require sweepcash S to participate and winners can withdraw sweepcash as a cash prize. You can filter for sweepstakes markets on the browse page.
Redeem your sweepcash won from markets at
S1.00
→ $1.00
, minus a 5% fee.
Learn more.
© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules