I will resolve this question as "yes," if the New York Times publishes a story stating that a U.S. citizen, involved in a protest situation, was killed by a U.S. military service member in the year 2025.
This may not be resolved within 2025 because a confirmed killing may occur as late as 12/31/2025.
I will post a free-access link to the Times article I use as confirmation of a "yes" resolution.
Update 2025-06-11 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has clarified that for a 'yes' resolution, the U.S. military service member involved must be on-duty. Incidents where the service member is off-duty will not count.
Update 2025-06-17 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): A killing will still count for a Yes resolution even if the service member was acting in self-defense.
1,000
3.00@JussiVilleHeiskanen to my thinking, it will still count as "Yes" because using the U.S. military to police protesters, like at Kent State, can lead to the service members feeling threatened and therefore justified in using arms against civilians.