Resolves YES only if both of the following are true:
- The United States experiences an internal armed conflict on U.S. territory that reaches “war” intensity (≥1,000 battle-related deaths in any rolling 12-month period) as defined by the UCDP/PRIO methodology (organized armed groups; “battle-related deaths” per UCDP). 
- At least two major analytic sources explicitly characterize the Charlie Kirk shooting as a key / major / proximate trigger (a “spark” or “catalyst”) for the conflict’s outbreak. It need not be the sole or primary cause; multi-cause narratives are acceptable so long as the shooting is clearly presented as one of the main triggers. 
Accepted sources for (2) (any two or more):
- International Crisis Group (CrisisWatch or special reports) 
- UCDP/PRIO annual or special reports / syntheses 
- ACLED country analyses or annual overviews 
- U.S. Congressional Research Service (CRS) comprehensive reports 
- RAND Corporation comprehensive reports 
- Peer-reviewed academic syntheses (e.g., Journal of Peace Research) 
How we judge “key/proximate trigger”
Language such as “trigger,” “spark,” “proximate cause,” or “catalyst” qualifies; phrasing like “background contributor,” “one of many long-term drivers,” or mere mention without causal framing does not. If sources conflict, we go by whether ≥2 accepted sources meet the standard; contrary sources don’t veto a YES if the threshold is met.
Exclusions / edge cases
- Isolated attacks, riots, protests, or politically motivated killings that do not aggregate into an organized armed conflict at the war-intensity threshold resolve NO. 
- Secession or constitutional crises without the threshold above resolve NO. 
- If thresholds are crossed after the close date, resolve NO.. 
Timing & evidence window
Trading closes on 2027-12-31. To allow post-event syntheses to be published, resolution may occur after close but only based on whether the criteria above were met on or before 2027-12-31. If sufficient qualifying sources have not identified the shooting as the primary trigger by 2028-06-30, resolves NO.
Primary data for (1): UCDP/PRIO organized-violence datasets/definitions (war-intensity threshold). Secondary corroboration: ACLED event-level data for timing and aggregation (does not lower thresholds).
Note:
This market concerns definitions and sources, not normative judgments. No celebration or endorsement of violence in comments; keep discussion civil, please.
Your title says "primary" cause while your description says "major" cause. Please correct your title.