If the Supreme Court revisits Obergefell by 2029, who will vote against a constitutional right to same-sex marriage?
8
Ṁ1630
2028
92%
Clarence Thomas
75%
Samuel Alito
25%
Neil Gorsuch
25%
Brett Kavanaugh
25%
Amy Coney Barrett
20%
John Roberts
10%
Sonia Sotomayor
7%
Elena Kagan
5%
Ketanji Brown Jackson

Resolves YES for any justice who votes against a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and NO for any justice who votes for a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Resolves N/A for any justice not on the Court during the case, or who recuses themselves. Applies only to the first case revisiting the constitutional right to same-sex marriage by the end of the current presidential term (January 20, 2029), and resolves N/A if no such case occurs.

Justices' opinions on other related questions, such as whether the reasoning of Obergefell was correct, whether Congress has the right to legislate on same-sex marriage, whether private citizens can discriminate against same-sex couples, etc. are irrelevant. This resolves only based on how justices vote on the question of whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

I won't bet on it because it's my own market, but my own predictions for the record:
Gubznf, avargl creprag

Nyvgb, rvtugl-svir creprag

Oneergg, fvkgl creprag

Xninanhtu, svsgl creprag

Eboregf, sbegl creprag

Tbefhpu, gjragl-svir creprag

Wnpxfba, gjb creprag

Xntna, bar creprag

Fbgbznlbe, bar creprag

@ZaneMiller I enormously respect the choice not to bet. I don't know how to decode your predictions though.

My main prediction is that no such case will occur and the market will resolve N/A, but you can infer the predictions I am confident about from my betting.

this is just predictions conditional on there being a case

already I am confused about my own predictions, including why I chg Wnpxfba nf uvtu nf gjb creprag (naq eryngviryl uvture guna Xntna!)

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules