Some news outlets have just begun to seriously consider the theory that non-human intelligence is responsible for some of the UFO sightings in New Jersey and elsewhere around the world. I've also noticed that more of my comments supporting this hypothesis are receiving likes and upvotes than they did a week ago. Will this finally break through to become a leading theory?
This market will resolve to YES if, before December 31, 2024 at 11:59:59pm EST, the New York Times, CNN, ABC, NBC, or CBS (specifically excluding Fox and MSNBC) posts an article as its front page headline, or leads its Nightly News show with a segment suggesting or investigating this theory.
"Drones generating mass panic" is not sufficient. "X presents three leading theories for drones" is not sufficient. "Non-human intelligence (or any similar term) being investigated as cause of drones" is sufficient. These must be the headlines or first paragraph or first statements in the reporting of the leading breaking news story on one outlet. NHI cannot just be discussed or dismissed as one possible theory later in a segment or article.
It is not necessary for non-human intelligence to actually be confirmed to as the cause of any sightings for a YES resolution.
A YES resolution is possible if this headline refers to any sightings that have occurred after November 1, 2024 at any location on or near Earth. Reports about life being discovered through a telescope on another planet are specifically excluded.
1,000
3.00The mentioned news outlets not only didn't mention non-human intelligence as a leading theory, they seem to go to great lengths to avoid mentioning it as even one theory among many. The news has fallen off the front page and the situation becomes more unexplained every day, despite the number of drone sightings continuing to rise in New Jersey.
Therefore, the resolution of this market is NO, even though it's absurd that the story was the #1 topic on December 13 and now there are even more drones and nobody is asking any questions.
@ProjectVictory If it is published in one of these specific media outlets, then I would argue that it has become one, because these are not the first outlets where that theory is likely to be agreed upon.