Will the first WSJ article about Manifold mention assassination markets?
Plus
16
Ṁ7642026
38%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Mentioning assassination markets does not need to involve the word "assassination", as long as there's a clear reference to the moral hazard and potential controversy.
To count, the article must be substantially about Manifold Markets as a place for prediction markets. As in other contexts, I'll use "33% of the length is actually about Manifold" as a rough threshold, but I reserve the right to adjust if I decide that rule is inappropriate on a case-by-case basis.
I'll not be betting in this market, of course.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000
and3.00
Sort by:
@JimHays doesn't need the word "assassination", but needs to be clearly referencing the moral hazard and opportunity for controversy
Related questions
Related questions
Will the first WaPo article about Manifold mention assassination markets?
32% chance
Will the first CNN article about Manifold mention assassination markets?
29% chance
Will the first BBC article about Manifold mention assassination markets?
30% chance
Will the first Reuters article about Manifold mention assassination markets?
11% chance
Will the first mention of Manifold in mainstream news be positive?
47% chance
Will the New York Times create a market on Manifold by end of 2027?
13% chance
Will the WSJ, NYT, FT, or Economist create a market on Manifold by 2030?
20% chance
Will the Wall Street Journal create a market on Manifold by end of 2027?
16% chance
Will anybody leak classified documents to settle a market on Manifold Markets before 2026?
11% chance