please remember guys it can’t be stuff that we obviously suspect that he likes, there has to be fairly direct evidence like following beff jezos for e/acc. If i can’t find evidence that he likes spaghetti Ill have to resolve no

@ZaneMiller Im going to resolve e/acc as yes because he effectively accelerated a bullet into a man

@PaulHan ???? If this is a joke market you should have made that more clear

that’s just a joke i was convinced by Zane and the comments below but just decided to say that. Also, that joke has a serious philosophical basis, shooting a Healthcare CEO to enact social change is accelerationism of more traditional sort, and combined with his techno utopian beliefs it would be ideologically consistent for him to be e/acc

@PaulHan now you might say that i also resolved Uncle Ted as yes so how could I also say he’s e/acc - well both positions are strongly anti statist and have similar critiques of the industrial revolution they just have diverging solutions based on the situation forceable at the time

@PaulHan Like you said, e/acc is about technological acceleration, specifically AI, not traditional accelerationism.

im just gonna go on Kiwi farms a couple days before the market resolves and find all this out

resolving longevity as yes

I don’t know if he’s heard of Mishima but Mishima would say this. I can’t say he likes Mishima from this

is following beff jezos evidence of e/acc? probably not right

@PaulHan isn't beff one of the main people in e/acc?

@ZaneMiller yeah but he said he liked effective altruism and his big thing socially was watching less porn and developing more real relationships and stuff. on the other hand he’s big on the future being radically different. does that sound like e/acc? not rhetorical i’m not sure

@PaulHan I wouldn't think e/acc was opposed to effective altruism or personally avoiding porn.

@ZaneMiller i’ll keep thinking about it it seems to be the most controversial one

resolving IQ as yes

@PaulHan Does this mean anyone who references dumb people and intelligent people likes IQ?

so he liked cumtown which gives fairly good odds he liked redscare.

If he had even mentioned the name Emil at one point I’m resolving IQ yea

from
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/rcna183996

@MIMIRMAGNVS

@PaulHan yeah it's starting to get creepy

what did he mean by this

Is there evidence of Luigi being interested in IQ?

Resolving ACX as yes due to him subscribing to it on substack and resolving Norm MacDonald as yes due to his use of the doghouse joke on a tweet. Bring in more evidence please!

@spiderduckpig Doesn't this imply that he dislikes the industrial revolution and its consequences?

@placebo_username Well I assume the question is referring to if he likes the text titled "Industrial Revolution and it's Consequences," not that he likes the Industrial Revolution itself

@spiderduckpig I don't know of any text by that title. The Kaczynski manifesto is titled "Industrial Society and its Future."

@PaulHan Can you clarify?

@placebo_username You're right, it's actually the first few words in the text that read "The industrial revolution and its consequences," still pretty sure that's what the question is referring to though

@spiderduckpig I suppose incipits for religious texts are an ancient tradition... but usually Consequences would be capitalized in that case. I still think my literal reading makes more sense.

@placebo_username Daniel a man died

@PaulHan Please do clarify. The two interpretations of the answer are obviously extremely different.

@PaulHan Yes, it's very sad. But I don't think leaving this answer ambiguous will bring much comfort to his family.

@jskf You’re being a turboautist. Normies know that manifesto by the opening lines, not the actual title. It’s clear what he meant.

@FoxKHTML If it was in quotes/mentioned Ted Kaczynski it wouldn't be a problem. The issue is that quoting the line would also be a mildly amusing way to invert the answer. When I first read it I knew what it was referencing, but I still wasn't sure which interpretation was intended.

@jskf Just use common sense, my man

@FoxKHTML This is not at all a matter of common sense, both interpretations would make perfect sense.

@PaulHan He gave it 4 stars. I think this is strong enough positive proof he enjoyed Industrial Society and Its Future

@placebo_username Daniel is wrong

@PaulHan So then please edit the answer to make it clear. Thanks!

@PaulHan Why not resolve "IR and its consequences" to YES then?

@FoxKHTML is correct because if one were to acknowledge the existence of the phrase IR and its consequences it would only be in relation to agreeing with Uncle Ted’s position because the essence of the term is necessarily negative. Fox is totally right because it’s common sense and also logical. Daniel your position is not more logical just more myopic

@PaulHan to give an example, it is like recognizing the validity of the phrase “the terroristic american state” and having a positive view of america foreign policy

@PaulHan xkcd.com/1984/