In 2030, a majority of experts will think open sourcing Llama 3.1 405 was a dangerous move in hindsight.
Basic
10
Ṁ2582030
11%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
In 2030, a majority of experts will look back and agree that there was not significant justification for believing with greater than 90% confidence that Llama 3.1 405 would not provide the foundation for nefarious actors to produce existentially risky artificially intelligent systems.
Will resolve to a consensus of experts in 2030.
If no clear data exists that demonstrates the opinion of experts, a poll will be used for resolution.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Related questions
Related questions
Will there be a disaster caused by open source developers doing unsafe things with AI by 2028?
61% chance
Will manifold think "it would be safer if all AI was open source" when:
Will many open source advocates agree frontier models have crossed capability thresholds too dangerous to open source?
10% chance
Will an open source LLM (Vicuna, Alpaca, etc.) exceed ChatGPT interest by 2030?
59% chance
Will a Mamba-based LLM of GPT 3.5 quality or greater be open sourced in 2024?
73% chance
Will Llama-4 be (open sourced and) as good as GPT-4?
87% chance
Will Humanity deploy any new technology in an unsafe way by 2030 according to LeCun?
52% chance
Will Meta pull Llama 2 / make it closed source due to PR before 2025?
2% chance
Will SB 1047 become law? Will Meta open source Llama 4 (or equivalent)
Will Humanity deploy any new technology in an unsafe way by 2030? (Contra LeCun)
92% chance