This market resolves YES if, by December 31, 2035, it is publicly revealed that the Signal messaging application contained a security vulnerability that was:
- Previously known to Signal's development team 
- NOT publicly disclosed within 90 days of discovery 
- Later revealed through whistleblowing, investigative reporting, leaked documents, or official admission 
- Classified as High or Critical severity (CVSS 7.0+) or could have compromised user privacy/message confidentiality 
Examples that would trigger YES:
- Internal Signal documents leaked showing they knew about a vulnerability but didn't disclose it 
- Former Signal employees revealing they were aware of security issues that weren't made public 
- Government agencies admitting they had knowledge of Signal vulnerabilities they didn't report 
- Academic researchers revealing they privately reported vulnerabilities that Signal never acknowledged publicly 
Exclusions:
- Vulnerabilities that were properly disclosed through responsible disclosure processes 
- Issues discovered and patched before any third party became aware 
- Theoretical vulnerabilities never actually present in released versions 
- False claims or unsubstantiated allegations 
The market resolves NO if no credible evidence emerges of such undisclosed known vulnerabilities by the deadline.