What'll be the conclusions of a large study into the ease of learning quantum mechanics with different interpretations?
Plus
1
Ṁ11552027
50%
QBism makes it easiest to learn
46%
GRW makes it easiest to learn
46%
De Broglie-Bohm makes it easiest to learn
46%
Retrocausality makes it easiest to learn
46%
"Teach the controversy" makes it harder to learn than any of them
46%
Many-worlds makes it easiest to learn
Obviously this market only resolves if such a study is conducted (it should be though!)
The standard for "having learned quantum mechanics" is a place where subjectivity might creep into this. There must be at least some understanding of the Bell inequalities, density matrices, and the Born rule.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Related questions
Related questions
Which interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is closest to the truth?
Will a theory of everything (a theory that unites relativity and quantum mechanics) be found in physics by 2040?
27% chance
Will a theory of everything (a theory that unites relativity and quantum mechanics) be found in physics by 2040?
45% chance
Is the brain quantum?
30% chance
By the beginning of 2035, will physicists and philosophers mostly agree on the correct interpretation of quantum mechanics?
11% chance
Will Oppenheim's unified theory of gravity and quantum mechanics pass the test?
30% chance
Will we know if gravity is fundamentally quantum by the end of 2030?
20% chance
Will future language models converge on "what Einstein would have thought of Many-Worlds?" before 2036?
46% chance
In what year will quantum advantage be demonstrated for practical quantum chemistry problems? (before 2030)
2028
Will quantum mechanical properties prove explanatory for another biological process by the end of 2024?
30% chance