What'll be the conclusions of a large study into the ease of learning quantum mechanics with different interpretations?
Plus
1
Ṁ11552027
50%
QBism makes it easiest to learn
46%
GRW makes it easiest to learn
46%
De Broglie-Bohm makes it easiest to learn
46%
Retrocausality makes it easiest to learn
46%
"Teach the controversy" makes it harder to learn than any of them
46%
Many-worlds makes it easiest to learn
Obviously this market only resolves if such a study is conducted (it should be though!)
The standard for "having learned quantum mechanics" is a place where subjectivity might creep into this. There must be at least some understanding of the Bell inequalities, density matrices, and the Born rule.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Related questions
Related questions
By the beginning of 2035, will physicists and philosophers mostly agree on the correct interpretation of quantum mechanics?
11% chance
Which interpretation of quantum mechanics will be accepted by 2030
Which interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is closest to the truth?
Will relational quantum mechanics become the consensus view by the end of 2040?
11% chance
Will a theory of everything (a theory that unites relativity and quantum mechanics) be found in physics by 2040?
25% chance
Will a theory of everything (a theory that unites relativity and quantum mechanics) be found in physics by 2040?
47% chance
Will Oppenheim's unified theory of gravity and quantum mechanics pass the test?
30% chance
Rule 30 involved in a computational explanation of quantum mecanics by 2040 ?
12% chance
Will quantum mechanical properties prove explanatory for another biological process by the end of 2024?
30% chance
Is quantum mechanics computable?
94% chance